of falsehood preferred
by Lim against De
Eitel, together with
a copy of
Dr Eitel's
reply to that charge
2.
With reference
to your remarks
upon Mr Johnson's
conduct in connection
with this affair, I
see no reason to
complain of Mr
Johnson's having
applied to Dr Eitel
28
for information
and I am
of
opinion that he
was fully justified
in repeating Dr
Eitel's statements to
Mr Hayllar and in
subsequently bringing
Dr Eitel's conduct under
my
notice.
It appears
that at an interview
between Dr Eitel
and Mr Johnson on the 20th of September
of falsehood prefered
beylim against De
Eitil, together with
a copy of
dr Exteri
reply to that charge
2.
With reference
your remarks
apon Mt Johnson's
conduct in connection
with this affain, I
see no reason to
complam of her
Johnson's having
applied to dr Extre
28
for information
and I am
of
opinion that he
was fully justified
in repeating du
Eiteli statements to
Mer Hayllar and in
subsequently bringing
Dr Eiteli conduch under
my
notice.
It appears
that at an interview
between de Eitel
and Mr Johnson. on the 20th of September
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.